检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]约翰• 霍普金斯大学,马里兰州 巴尔的摩 [2]汕头大学,广东 汕头 [3]怀化学院,湖南 怀化
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2019年第12期2072-2081,共10页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:在政治科学领域,国家的概念至为重要。然而,尽管其在政治科学领域中占据核心,且无处不在,学术界对于国家的构成主体仍然缺乏明确的共识。政治学学者对国家的认识存在很大分歧,而对如何衡量国家规模的共识更少。曾有学者建议,用人口数量、经济指标、军事能量等变量来衡量国家规模,但并未达成共识。本文论证了统一国家规模的定义的必要性,并指出衡量一个国家规模唯一有效且合理的路径,就是衡量国家控制下的领土面积,除此之外用其他任何变量来测定国家规模的做法都欠妥当。In the field of political science, the concept of state is very important. However, although it occu-pies the core in the field of political science and is ubiquitous, the academic community still lacks a clear consensus on the main measures of a country. Scholars in the field of political science have great differences on the understanding of the country;they have limited consensuses on how to measure the size of a country. Some scholars have suggested that the population, economic indicators, military forces and other variables should be used to measure the size of a country, but there is no consensus. This paper demonstrates the necessity of unifying the definition of the scale of a country, and points out that the most effective and reasonable way to measure the scale of a country is to measure the territorial area under the control by the country. It is not appropriate to use any other variables to measure the scale of a country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49