检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]许昌学院,河南 许昌
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2023年第2期788-794,共7页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:在师范专业认证背景下,为科学客观分析课程思政质量,建立完善、多角度的课程思政质量评价体系,选取许昌学院2018级《中国地理》课程作为研究对象,以课程思政目标达成度为研究内容,定量与定性相结合,对过程性评价、试卷及问卷进行分析,在此基础上发现课程思政中存在考核标准细化性、考核方式多元性,定性评价多层性不足的问题,并提出解决对策,为师范专业课程思政教学质量以及专业核心素养的持续改进提供借鉴。In the context of teacher training certification, in order to scientifically and objectively analyze the ideological and political quality of the curriculum and establish a sound and multifaceted evaluation system for the ideological and political quality of the curriculum, the 2018 Chinese Geography course of Xuchang University was selected as the research object, and the achievement of the ideological and political curriculum goals was taken as the research content. Quantitative and qualitative calculations were combined to analyze the process evaluation, examination papers and questionnaires. On this basis, we found that there are problems in the ideological and political education curriculum, such as the refinement of assessment standards, the diversity of assessment methods, and the lack of multi-level qualitative evaluation, and put forward solutions to provide reference for the continuous improvement of the ideological and political education quality and professional core quality of the normal professional curriculum.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145