片面共犯全面否定说之证成  

The Evidence of the Comprehensive Denial of One-Sided Accomplices

作　　者：周宸 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏 苏州

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2023年第4期2009-2018,共10页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：对于片面共犯问题,存在全面肯定说、部分肯定说、全面否定说的对立。在片面共犯所形成的现实困境的背景下,肯定说总体而言存在着众多理论与实践的困境,故对其展开批判,同时对片面共犯全面否定说加以证成。全面否定说肯定了双向意思联络对构成共同犯罪的重要性,强调了“共同故意”的本质特征,避免了共犯逻辑上的困境,也使得各行为主体所受处罚符合罪刑相适应原则,且按照我国单一正犯的体系,全面否定说并不存在法律障碍。以单独犯定罪处罚的解决路径可以使片面共犯问题得到切实而妥善的处理。For the problem of one-sided accomplices, there are oppositions of comprehensive affirmation, partial affirmation and comprehensive negation. Against the background of the realistic dilemma formed by one-sided accomplices, it is affirmed that there are many theoretical and practical dilemmas in general, so it criticizes them, and at the same time justifies the comprehensive negation of one-sided accomplices. The theory of total denial affirms the importance of two-way intentional communication in the formation of joint crimes, emphasizes the essential characteristics of “joint intention”, avoids the logical dilemma of accomplices, and makes the punishment of each actor comply with the principle of adaptation of crime and punishment, and according to my country’s system of a single principal offender, there is no legal obstacle to a comprehensive denial. The solution path of convicting and punishing individual offenders can effectively and properly handle the problem of one-sided accomplices.

关 键 词：片面共犯 全面否定说 单一正犯 共同犯罪 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]