检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泰山学院教师教育学院,山东 泰安
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2024年第1期273-280,共8页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:目的:探究奖惩激励对羞怯个体面孔情绪识别的影响。方法:本研究利用羞怯量表筛选被试(羞怯组22人;非羞怯组22人),采用线索–靶子实验范式和混合设计,考察羞怯和非羞怯被试在奖励、惩罚、中性情境中对正性、负性和中性面孔进行识别的正确率和反应时。结果:正确率结果无显著差异。然而,反应时结果表明奖惩激励促进了羞怯个体对情绪面孔的识别;而对于非羞怯个体,除了情绪面孔,奖惩激励也促进了中性面孔识别。此外,用奖励和惩罚试次的反应时减去中性试次的反应时获得了反应时差值。结果表明,在加工正性面孔时,羞怯个体的奖惩激励差值大于非羞怯个体(负性面孔未达显著性水平)。结论:上述结果为奖惩激励促进了羞怯个体情绪面孔识别提供了证据,同时表明不同动机/情绪凸显信息可能呈现出一种累积效应,导致羞怯个体察觉到更多威胁信息。Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of reward and punishment incentive on face emotion recognition of shy individuals. Method: 44 shy and non-shy college students were selected and asked to discriminate a positive, neutral, or negative face, which was preceded by a reward, punishment incentive or non-incentive cue, and was followed by a feedback stimulus regarding fastness and correctness of the response. Result: There was no significant difference in accuracy results. However, RT results showed that reward and punishment inspired the recognition of emotional faces for shy students, but inspired the recognition of both emotional faces and neutral faces for non-shy students. Difference value were obtained by subtracting RTs in neutral trials from RTs in reward, punishment trials and showed that when processing positive faces, the difference value of shy students was greater than non-shy students (the difference of negative faces did not reach a significant level). Conclusion: The above results provide evidence that reward and punishment incentives inspired emotional face recognition of shy individuals and indicated that different motivational/emotional salience information may increase the cumulative contextual risk therefore making shy individuals detect more social threats.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248