检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]陆军边海防学院昆明校区,云南 昆明 [2]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁 大连
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2024年第11期550-556,共7页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:基于线索利用模型,个体能够依据不同的线索做出学习判断。但在一些条件下给定线索对学习判断和记忆成绩的影响会出现分离,研究者将这种现象称为学习判断中的元认知错觉。文章分析归纳了学习判断中元认知错觉的类型及其产生机制;在此基础上,指出未来研究应关注以下几个方面:(1) 探讨线索交互条件下元认知错觉的类型;(2) 探究元认知错觉的产生机制;(3) 探索减少元认知错觉的有效条件。Based on cue-utilization model, participants could make judgment of learning based on different clues. However, under some conditions, individual’s JOL and memory performance might be inconsistent based on some cues, and the researchers referred to this phenomenon as metacognitive illusion. The paper analyzed and summarized the types and causes of metacognitive illusions in judgment of learning. On this basis, we pointed out that future research should further consider the following issues: (1) Discuss the relationship between judgment of learning and memory performance under the conditions of clues;(2) Explore the mechanism of metacognitive illusions;(3) Explore the effective conditions of reducing the metacognitive illusions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7