检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁美军
机构地区:[1]北方工业大学经济管理学院,北京
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2024年第11期638-649,共12页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:课程思政既是实务界的关注重点,也是理论界的研究热点。本文基于实用主义和学术价值的双重考量,运用科学知识图谱的方法,对课程思政融入会计专业教育进行了系统的理论与实践探索。研究发现,自2010年起,该领域研究经历了从探索到快速发展的转变,尤其在2020年达到高峰;研究学科虽集中于工商管理和教育领域,但正逐步向多学科交叉拓展;关键词共现与聚类分析揭示,课程思政、会计专业、教学改革等是热点话题,研究热点聚焦于会计专业课程思政的现实需求、实践途径和供给创新。本文从理论研究、实践应用及学科研究三个维度,为课程思政融入会计专业教育提供了系统梳理与实践指导,对提升会计人才培养质量具有重要理论与实践意义。Integrating Ideological and Political Education into Courses (hereinafter referred to as IPEC) constitutes both a pivotal practical concern and a prominent research focus within theoretical realms. Grounded in a dual emphasis on pragmatism and academic merit, this paper adopts the methodology of mapping knowledge domains to comprehensively delve into the theory and practice of embedding IPEC within accounting professional education. Our investigation reveals that, since 2010, research in this domain has transitioned from exploratory endeavors to rapid development, culminating in 2020. While the research disciplines primarily concentrate on business administration and education, they are progressively extending towards interdisciplinary integration. An analysis of keyword co-occurrences and clusters underscores that IPEC, the accounting profession, and educational reform are prevailing topics, with research concentrations centered around the practical necessities, methodologies, and supply-side innovations of IPEC in accounting professional curricula. This paper offers a systematic review and practical guidance for the integration of IPEC into accounting professional education, enc
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.221.103