检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟领
机构地区:[1]北京石油化工学院人文学院,北京
出 处:《国学(汉斯)》2024年第1期27-31,共5页Chinese Traditional Culture
摘 要:佛教缘起论是一个博大精深的思想体系。在早期佛教时期,缘起论主要围绕如何解脱这一主题展开的,在世界观和认识论方面并没有充分展开。这就引发了一些理论质疑:佛教既然主张无我,那么谁在轮回,善恶业力如何传承;物质世界是如何缘起的,缘起论有没有普遍适用性;如果把诸法缘起界定为因缘和合,那么不可再分的极微和不生不灭的无为法还是不是缘起法。通过对这些问题的梳理,我们指出部派佛教对缘起思想的某些阐释是不正确的。The Buddhist theory of dependent origination represents a vast and intricate philosophical framework. In the early Buddhist era, this theory primarily revolved around the pursuit of liberation, without extensive exploration in cosmology and epistemology. This limitation invites theoretical inquiries: given Buddhism’s doctrine of Anātman (non-self), who experiences rebirth, and how is karma, both meritorious and malevolent, transmitted? Is the external world genuine, and does the theory of dependent origination have universal applicability? Furthermore, if we categorize all phenomena as products of interdependent causes and conditions, how do we account for the indivisible minutiae and the immutable, unconditioned phenomena? Through sorting out these problems, we point out that some interpretations of the idea of dependent origination in Sectarian Buddhism are incorrect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7