论授权行为瑕疵  

On Defects in Authorised Conduct

作　　者：华扬 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第3期1023-1028,共6页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：随着《中华人民共和国民法典》出台与生效,代理方面的相关规定也日渐完善。但是,《民法典》依旧没有解释代理的本质为何,进而延伸出授权行为瑕疵时,本人、代理人、相对人之间的责任问题。根据《民法典》第171条以及法律行为的相关规定,授权行为撤销后,当代理人善意时,不承担责任;当相对人善意时,将会根据不同情形享有依据《民法典》第157条或第171条规定的请求权。With the introduction and entry into force of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, the provisions relating to agency have become increasingly sophisticated. However, the Civil Code still does not explain the nature of agency, which in turn extends to the question of liability between the person, the agent and the opposite party in the event of a defective act of authorisation. Accord-ing to Article 171 of the Civil Code and the relevant provisions on legal acts, the revocation of an act of authorisation does not give rise to liability when the agent has acted in good faith;when the opposite party has acted in good faith, he or she will have the right to claim under Article 157 or 171 of the Civil Code, depending on the circumstances.

关 键 词：意定代理 授权行为 意思表示瑕疵 表见代理 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]