检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包玉阳
机构地区:[1]青岛大学法学院,山东 青岛
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第1期479-485,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:教唆自杀热点事件的频发使得该行为的社会危害性逐渐浮出水面,我国现有立法中并无明确规定对其进行有效遏制,对该行为是否具有可罚性也在学术界存在较大争议。考察域外有关“教唆自杀行为”相关立法,发现绝大多数国家和地区将教唆自杀行为单独入罪,不仅表明该行为的不法性,而且起到震慑犯罪分子以及预防犯罪的作用。因此,本文在对教唆自杀行为的概念、立法实践进行界定与剖析的基础上,对该行为的可罚性进行合理论证,以期对立法及司法实践提供参考价值。The frequent occurrence of hot events of instigation suicide makes the social harmfulness of this behavior gradually surface. There is no clear stipulation in the existing legislation of our country to effectively curb it, and there is a great controversy about whether this behavior is punishable. It is found that the vast majority of countries and regions criminalize the act of soliciting suicide separately, which not only shows the lawlessness of the act, but also plays a role in deterring criminals and preventing crimes. Therefore, on the basis of the definition and analysis of the concept and legislative practice of instigation suicide, this paper makes a reasonable demonstration of the punishment of this behavior, in order to provide reference value for legislation and judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7