检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第2期1051-1059,共9页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:前期物业合同能否对业主专有权进行限制在实践和学理上都存在争议。基于业主专有权的特殊性,设置限制性条款具有基础性和功能性的原因。但是,从前期物业合同的特征来看,在前期物业合同中设置专有权有可能存在限制范围过宽导致业主权益受损的弊端,应当借助一定方法对之加以防范。我国应当通过设置专有权限制性条款的边界来确立效力规则,规制不当条款。同时,从立法、司法和行政执法三个层面构建全面保护业主权益的治理体系,维护业主的合法权益。It has been argued whether prophase property service contract can restrict the owner’s proprietary rights is controversial in both practice and doctrine. Based on the special characteristics of the owner’s exclusive right, the setting of restrictive clauses has basic and functional reasons. However, from the characteristics of the prophase property service contract, setting restriction clause on exclusive rights in prophase property service contract may be so wide scope that damage the owner’s rights and interests, should be guarded against with the help of certain methods. China should be set the boundary of exclusive rights restrictive clauses to establish the effectiveness of the rules to regulate the improper provisions. At the same times, China should build a governance system that comprehensively protects the rights and interests of owners from the three levels of legislation, justice and administrative law enforcement to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of owners.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43