检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶静艳
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2024年第6期7-13,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:我国商标法历经五次修改,愈发重视商标的使用,但并未有针对服务商标的具体条款,忽视服务商标的地域性特征。司法实践中,对服务商标地域性的考量存在不同做法,法官自由裁量权较大,裁判结果不一,均未重视商标的实际使用。服务商标的地域性是商标实际使用情况的反映,影响混淆可能性的判断,在服务商标侵权判断中考虑具有正当性。在重视商标使用的前提下,服务商标地域性的考量应结合服务商标所在行业特点、商标权人的使用方式和使用范围、适当考虑被告的使用方式综合判断。Trademark Law has undergone five revisions, and more and more attention has been paid to the use of trademarks, but there are no specific provisions for service marks, ignoring the regional characteristics of service marks. In judicial practice, there are different approaches to the consideration of the territoriality of service trademarks, with judges having greater discretion and different adjudication results, all of which do not attach importance to the actual use of trademarks. The territoriality of a service mark is a reflection of the actual use of the trademark, which affects the judgment of the likelihood of confusion, and is considered legitimate in the judgment of service mark infringement. On the premise of attaching importance to the use of the trademark, the consideration of the territoriality of the service mark should be comprehensively judged in combination with the characteristics of the industry in which the service mark is located, the trademark owner’s mode of use and scope of use, and the defendant’s use mode with due consideration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33