新时代刑法观的选择——以侵犯公民个人信息罪为例  

The Choice of Criminal Law Viewpoint in the New Era—Taking the Crime of Violating Personal Information as an Example

作　　者：赵一凡 

机构地区：[1]宁夏大学法学院,宁夏 银川

出　　处：《争议解决》2025年第2期12-19,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：刑法观的讨论持续数年,但仍未有定论,面临构建中国自主的刑法学知识体系重任,必须要找出适合中国国情、能够指导中国实践的刑法观。为此,以结合毛泽东思想与海德格尔存在论的“实践存在论”为哲学基础,以“此在”、“存在”、“实践”的链接为契机,捕捉到在当前时代背景下最有利的刑法观——结合型刑法观,即对积极、消极刑法观的有机结合,在法律编纂之初遵守刑法的谦抑性原则,在法定刑区间的界定中做到罪刑相适应,在司法实践中宽严相济。以结合型刑法观指导刑事法治的发展,才能更好地保护法益。The discussion on the concept of criminal law has been going on for several years, but no conclusion has been reached yet. Faced with the important task of constructing China’s independent knowledge system of criminal law, it is necessary to find out a concept of criminal law that is suitable for China’s national conditions and capable of guiding China’s practice. To this end, we take “practical existentialism”, which combines Mao Zedong Thought and ontology by Heidegger, as the philosophical foundation, and the linkage of “here”, “existence” and “practice” as the opportunity. The link between “Dasein”, “Existenz” and “practice” is an opportunity to capture the most favorable view of criminal law in the current context—a combined view of criminal law, an organic combination of positive and negative views of criminal law, observing the principle of modesty in criminal law at the outset of the law’s codification, making the crime and punishment fit the crime in defining the legal penalty range, and giving leniency and severity equal treatment in the practice of justice. In judicial practice, leniency and severity are in harmony. The combined criminal law view guides the development of the rule of law in order to better protect the interests of the law.

关 键 词：结合型刑法观 侵犯公民个人信息罪 实践存在论 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]