行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析  

An Analysis of the Permissibility of Reverse Litigation in Administrative Agreements

作　　者：王珂 

机构地区：[1]青岛科技大学法学院,山东 青岛

出　　处：《争议解决》2025年第3期146-150,共5页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：行政协议反向诉讼之容许性探析,通过剖析行政协议反向诉讼的理论基础,揭示其内涵与特征,明确其在行政法律关系中的定位。同时,详细分析构建行政协议反向诉讼面临的现实困境,包括行政协议识别难题、传统诉讼理念束缚以及非诉执行机制制约等。进而提出突破困境的路径,如明确行政协议认定标准、转变诉讼理念、优化非诉执行机制等。在此基础上,进一步阐述行政协议反向诉讼的制度构建与程序设计,包括诉讼主体资格确定、诉讼程序运行、证据规则与举证责任分配等方面。最后,探讨保障行政协议反向诉讼制度有效实施的措施,强调加强司法能力建设、强化监督制约机制以及推动行政机关依法行政的重要性。通过全面系统的研究,为行政协议反向诉讼制度的构建与完善提供理论支持与实践参考。An Analysis of the Permissibility of Reverse Litigation on Administrative Agreements: By dissecting the theoretical foundation of reverse litigation on administrative agreements, this paper reveals its connotation and characteristics, and clarifies its position within administrative legal relations. Meanwhile, it conducts a detailed analysis of the practical dilemmas faced in constructing reverse litigation in administrative agreements, including the difficulties in identifying administrative agreements, the constraints of traditional litigation concepts, and the restrictions of the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Furthermore, it proposes ways to break through these dilemmas, such as clarifying the identification criteria for administrative agreements, changing litigation concepts, and optimizing the non-litigation enforcement mechanism. Based on this, the paper further elaborates on the institutional construction and procedural design of reverse litigation in administrative agreements, covering aspects such as the determination of litigation subject qualifications, the operation of the litigatio

关 键 词：行政协议 反向诉讼 证据规则与举证责任分配 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]