检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]延安大学医学院,陕西 延安 [2]西安市胸科医院呼吸与危重症医学科,陕西 西安
出 处:《临床个性化医学》2024年第3期982-993,共12页Journal of Clinical Personalized Medicine
摘 要:目的:采用Meta分析评价支气管镜灌洗术治疗老年重症肺部感染的有效性及安全性。方法:通过计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方医学网、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、The Cochrane Library等数据库,搜集时间为自建库至2024年2月期间支气管镜灌洗术用于治疗老年重症肺部感染的随机对照试验(RCT),由两位研究者根据设定的纳入与排除标准对文献进行筛选,并提取相关资料。为确保研究的客观性和准确性,同时对纳入的研究进行了偏倚风险的评估。最后利用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0软件进行了深入的Meta分析。结果:共纳入17篇文献,总计1516位研究对象,其中试验组共758位,对照组共758位,Meta分析结果显示,相较于常规治疗,支气管肺泡灌洗术能更有效地提高治疗有效率[RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.18, 1.29), P 2 (MD = 11.81, 95%CI: 11.13, 12.48, P Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lavage in the treatment of elderly patients with severe pulmonary infection by meta-analysis. How: Through computer retrieval of CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Medical Network, CBM, PubMed, The Cochrane Library and other databases, The randomized controlled trial (RCT) of bronchoscopic lavage for the treatment of severe pulmonary infection in elderly patients was collected from the self-established database to February 2024. Two investigators screened the literature according to the set inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted relevant data. To ensure objectivity and accuracy, the included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software. Result: A total of 17 literatures were included, including a total of 1516 subjects, including 758 subjects in the experimental group and 758 subjects in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that bronchoalveolar lavage was more effective in improving the treatment response rate than conventional tre
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62