叙事修辞学视角下华语辩论世界杯修辞策略探究  

Exploring the Rhetorical Strategies of the Chinese Debate World Cup from the Perspective of Narrative Rhetoric

作　　者：余滢政 

机构地区：[1]上海大学外国语学院,上海

出　　处：《现代语言学》2025年第2期438-445,共8页Modern Linguistics

摘　　要：华语辩论世界杯自创始以来,便广受关注。文章运用叙事修辞学,以2024年华语辩论世界杯决赛为例,分析中国辩论赛事的叙事修辞策略的运用及其效果。研究发现,辩论中双方整体均采用了诸多的叙事修辞策略,但在不同阶段侧重不一。自述时建立逻辑框架,正方以逻辑诉诸为先,而反方侧重于举例。对辩时,双方均举反例辩驳,正方侧重于维护自我观点,而反方则侧重于主动出击。综合运用叙事策略,动态调整,于辩手而言,可赢取赛事胜利;于受众而言,能深层次理解事物的复杂面,站在双方角度思考问题,减少误解和冲突,有助于社会和谐。The Chinese Debate World Cup has attracted much attention since its inception. The article applies narrative rhetoric to analyze the use of narrative rhetorical strategies and their effects in Chinese debate tournaments, taking the final of the 2024 Chinese Debate World Cup as an example. The study finds that both sides of the debate as a whole used a number of narrative rhetorical strategies, but with different emphases at different stages. In the self-referential debate, both sides established a logical framework, with the positive side giving priority to logical recourse and the negative side focusing on giving examples. In the counter-argument, both sides cite counter-examples, with the positive side focusing on defending its own point of view and the negative side focusing on taking the initiative. Comprehensive use of narrative strategy, and dynamic adjustment, in terms of the debaters, can win the tournament;in terms of the audience, it can deeply understand the complexity of things, stand on both sides of the point of view of the problem, reduce misunderstandings and from the conflict, contribute to social harmony.

关 键 词：叙事 西方修辞学 辩论 策略 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]