检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高名湾
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学管理学院,北京
出 处:《现代管理》2024年第12期3362-3373,共12页Modern Management
摘 要:研究人员提出,包容型领导有助于员工在工作中积极主动,可以促进员工带来改变的机会。然而,实证研究表明,包容型对员工主动行为的影响是混合的。在本研究中,为了调和包容型领导对员工主动行为影响的不一致的研究结果,作者考虑了包容型领导在塑造员工主动行为中的内容、中介机制和边界条件。基于依恋理论,作者提出来自领导者的包容与支持通过增加员工的自我效能和自主动机,正向预测员工的主动工作行为。这些假设在来自北京和河北地区的135个员工样本中得到了支持。作者进一步提出,包容型领导的有益效应对依恋安全性较低的个体更为显著。这一假设也得到了支持:依恋焦虑高的个体尤其受益于包容型领导对自我效能的影响;而依恋回避高的个体,在包容型领导对自主动机的影响上尤其受益。我们的研究有助于解释包容型如何激励员工的主动行为,特别是对于那些依恋安全性较低的个体。Researchers suggest that inclusive leadership can help employees be proactive in their work and promote opportunities for change. However, empirical research has shown that the impact of inclusivity on employee proactive behavior is mixed. In this study, in order to reconcile the inconsistent research results on the impact of inclusive leadership on employee proactive behavior, the authors considered the content, mediating mechanisms, and boundary conditions of inclusive leadership in shaping employee proactive behavior. Based on attachment theory, the author proposes that tolerance and support from leaders positively predict employees’ proactive work behavior by increasing their self-efficacy and autonomous motivation. These hypotheses were supported by a sample of 135 employees from Beijing and Hebei regions. The author further proposes that the beneficial effects of inclusive leadership are more significant for individuals with lower attachment security. This hypothesi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.77.120