检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭宏政
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第4期2670-2674,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:居住权作为我国《民法典》中新设的物权,根据我国《民法典》311条第三款规定,存在被善意取得的制度理论上的可能。然而居住权的诞生背景具有强烈的社会帮扶和伦理性,善意取得制度则侧重于维护交易安全和合理信赖,可以说两者之间从根本的法价值上就具备天然的不协调性。这种冲突体现在具体法律文本和制度中时就使得二者在衔接适用上需要结合二者特性,重新认定居住权善意取得时的具体构成。As a new property right in China’s Civil Code, the right of residence has the theoretical possibility of being acquired in good faith according to the third paragraph of Article 311 of The Civil Code, but the birth background of the right of residence has a strong social support and ethical nature, while the good faith acquisition system focuses on maintaining the safety of transactions and reasonable trust, it can be said that the two have a natural incompatibility from the fundamental legal values, and this conflict is reflected in the specific legal text and system, which makes it necessary to combine the two in the application of the articulation of the specific composition of the right of residence in good faith acquisition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.25.60