检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐雪
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5551-5556,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《民法典》居住权作为一种用益物权,不仅发挥着促进社会稳定、稳固伦理价值的重要社会功能,还协调了所有权制度与婚姻家庭制度等制度,解决了社会中所涉的居住问题。但是,《民法典》物权编中关于居住权的规定也有模糊之处,甚至还有规范缺失的情况,因此,有必要在解释论的视角下,尽可能阐释其制度体系,明确其价值功能,使该制度能够从应然层面跃然而为实然层面。文章从居住权的渊源和制度意义出发,进一步阐释了居住权的体系内容,并对居住权制度构建下所衍生问题进行分析,以期对居住权理论和实践有所裨益。As a usufructuary right, the residence right in the Civil Code not only plays an important social function of promoting social stability and stabilizing ethical values, but also coordinates the system of ownership and the system of marriage and family to solve the housing problems involved in the society. However, the provisions on the right of residence in the title of the Civil Code are also vague, and even lack of norms. Therefore, it is necessary to explain its system as much as possible and clarify its value function from the perspective of interpretative theory, so that the system can be changed from the level of should to the level of reality. Starting from the origin and institutional significance of the right of residence, this paper further explains the content of the system of the right of residence, and analyzes the problems derived from the construction of the right of residence system, hoping to be beneficial to the theory and practice of the right of residence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117