检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
出 处:《运筹与模糊学》2023年第5期4659-4672,共14页Operations Research and Fuzziology
摘 要:本文研究直播带货考虑个体协作效应和损失规避的主播和产品的双边匹配问题分为两个部分:第一部分研究主播和产品匹配的个体协作效应,求解得到个体协作效应值;第二部分研究主播和产品在匹配过程中面对风险的规避情况,计算得到规范前景值。利用个体协作效应值对规范前景值进行修正,构建最终基于个体协作效应和损失规避的主播和产品的双边匹配满意度矩阵,求解最终匹配结果。并将同时考虑个体协作效应和损失规避条件下的双边匹配与单独考虑损失规避条件下的双边匹配结果做对比,结论表明:同时考虑个体协作效应和损失规避条件下的双边匹配更加稳定,且与单独考虑损失规避条件下的双边匹配结果有所不同。This paper studies the two-sided matching problem between the anchor and the product of live broadcast goods with consideration of individual collaboration effect and Loss aversion. It is divided into two parts: the first part studies the individual collaboration effect of the anchor and product matching, and calculates the individual collaboration effect size value;the second part studies the risk avoidance situation faced by anchors and products during the matching process, and calculates the normative prospect value. Use the individual collaboration Effect size to modify the normative prospect value, build the satisfaction matrix of the anchor and product bilateral matching based on the individual collaboration effect and Loss aversion, and solve the final matching result. The results of bilateral matching under the conditions of both individual col-laboration effect and Loss aversion are compared with those under the conditions of loss aversion alone. The conclusion shows that bilateral matching under the conditions of both individual collaboration effect and Loss aversion is more stable, and is different from that under the conditions of Loss aversion alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.37