检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学科学技术学院,财经学科部,江西 南昌
出 处:《可持续发展》2023年第4期1254-1264,共11页Sustainable Development
摘 要:本文使用Z值模型和EMS模型,结合中公教育2017~2022年的财务报告中的相关数据,对中公教育对赌协议完成后的财务风险进行评估分析,以此发现影响中公教育业绩“变脸”的主要因素。通过对比分析Z值与EMS模型的各因素,发现EsMS模型中X1指标是影响其财务风险变化的主要因素、X4指标是影响其财务风险的重要因素,还发现EMS模型预估新兴行业的财务风险更为准确。而且通过对EMS模型中X4指标的数据分析,测算出2018年中公教育就已经存在较大的财务风险,与其2018~2020年业绩迅猛增加并到达顶峰的情况不符。In this paper, Z-value model and EMS model are used, combined with the relevant data in the fi-nancial report of Zhonggong Education from 2017 to 2022, to evaluate and analyze the financial risks after the completion of the gambling agreement of Zhonggong Education, in order to find out the main factors affecting the performance of Zhonggong Education “face change”. Through com-parative analysis of Z-value and EMS model indicators it is found that X1 index in the EMS model is the main factor affecting the change of its financial risk, X4 index is an important affecting its fi-nancial risk, also found that the EMS model is more accurate to predict the financial risk of emerging industries. Moreover, through the data analysis of the X4 index in the EMS model, it is calculated that in 2018, there is already a large financial risk, which is inconsistent with the rapid increase and peak of its performance in 2018~2020.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7