检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Dodeye Igbong Oku Nyong James Enyia Benjamin Oluwadare Mafel Obhua Dodeye Igbong;Oku Nyong;James Enyia;Benjamin Oluwadare;Mafel Obhua(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nigeria Maritime University, Okerenkoko, Nigeria)
机构地区:[1]Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria [2]Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria [3]Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nigeria Maritime University, Okerenkoko, Nigeria
出 处:《Journal of Power and Energy Engineering》2021年第9期19-40,共22页电力能源(英文)
摘 要:In the present study, a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle (DORC) driven by geothermal hot water for electricity production is developed, investigated and optimized from the energy, exergy and exergoeconomic viewpoint. A parametric study is conducted to determine the effect of high-stage pressure<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span></span><span><span> </span>and low-stage pressure</span><span></span><span><span> </span>variation on the system thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performance. The DORC is further optimized to obtain maximum exergy efficiency optimized design (EEOD case) and minimum product cost</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">optimized design (PCOD case). The exergy efficiency and unit cost of power produced for the optimization of EEOD case and PCOD case are 33.03% and 3.059 cent/kWh, which are 0.3% and 17.4% improvement over base case, respectively. The PCOD case proved to be the best, with respect to minimum unit cost of power produced and net power output over the base case and EEOD case.In the present study, a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle (DORC) driven by geothermal hot water for electricity production is developed, investigated and optimized from the energy, exergy and exergoeconomic viewpoint. A parametric study is conducted to determine the effect of high-stage pressure<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span></span><span><span> </span>and low-stage pressure</span><span></span><span><span> </span>variation on the system thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performance. The DORC is further optimized to obtain maximum exergy efficiency optimized design (EEOD case) and minimum product cost</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">optimized design (PCOD case). The exergy efficiency and unit cost of power produced for the optimization of EEOD case and PCOD case are 33.03% and 3.059 cent/kWh, which are 0.3% and 17.4% improvement over base case, respectively. The PCOD case proved to be the best, with respect to minimum unit cost of power produced and net power output over the base case and EEOD case.
关 键 词:Geothermal Water Dual Pressure Organic Rankine Cycle Exergoeconomic Factor OPTIMIZATION
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33