机构地区:[1]Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria [2]Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK [3]Department of Health and Social Care, QAHE/London Metropolitan University Partnership, Birmingham, UK [4]Business Department, QAHE/Ulster University Partnership, Birmingham, UK
出 处:《Health》2024年第12期1250-1267,共18页健康(英文)
摘 要:Background: Dual practice occurs where healthcare professionals, particularly medical doctors, engage in concurrent public and private clinical work for remuneration. This practice can impact financial burden on patients when they are transferred from the public sector to private practice. Aim: To investigate the impact of physician self-referral on patient finances and how they coped with paying for private bills when diverted to private practice. Study setting: This study was carried out in Enugu urban, Southeast Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional design was adopted for this study with multistage sampling procedure used to recruit 407 households who had first visited a public hospital and then gone to a private hospital/clinic in the last 12 months of the study. Results: The total mean expenditure for treatment in private hospitals for the patient group who were referred from public hospitals was higher at a cash figure of N32,104 ($105), whereas the estimated cost of treatment in the public sector was found to be comparatively low at N9960 ($33). The total median costs were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test (p Conclusions: Public hospital administrators/managers could strengthen measures against the transfer of public patients to the private sector. Regulatory measures need to be strengthened to curtail the practice of physician self-referral and its associated financial burden resulting from patient diversion to private practice.Background: Dual practice occurs where healthcare professionals, particularly medical doctors, engage in concurrent public and private clinical work for remuneration. This practice can impact financial burden on patients when they are transferred from the public sector to private practice. Aim: To investigate the impact of physician self-referral on patient finances and how they coped with paying for private bills when diverted to private practice. Study setting: This study was carried out in Enugu urban, Southeast Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional design was adopted for this study with multistage sampling procedure used to recruit 407 households who had first visited a public hospital and then gone to a private hospital/clinic in the last 12 months of the study. Results: The total mean expenditure for treatment in private hospitals for the patient group who were referred from public hospitals was higher at a cash figure of N32,104 ($105), whereas the estimated cost of treatment in the public sector was found to be comparatively low at N9960 ($33). The total median costs were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test (p Conclusions: Public hospital administrators/managers could strengthen measures against the transfer of public patients to the private sector. Regulatory measures need to be strengthened to curtail the practice of physician self-referral and its associated financial burden resulting from patient diversion to private practice.
关 键 词:Physician Self-Referral Private Practice Dual Practice Financial Impact
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...