Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]  

Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:Chet R. Rees 

机构地区:[1]Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, USA

出  处:《Open Journal of Radiology》2017年第4期249-249,共1页放射学期刊(英文)

摘  要:The original online version of this article (C. Savage, T. Seale IV, C. Shaw, B. Angela, D. Marichal and C. Rees, “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures,” Open Journal of Radilogy, 3, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2013.33024) was mistaken of the total isolates number in Table 2. The authors wish to correct the errors to: Table 2. Other study parameters “Gycm2” should be changed to “cGycm2” All of the decimal points (“.”) should be changed to commas (“,”). For example, “47.486” should be “47,486”.The original online version of this article (C. Savage, T. Seale IV, C. Shaw, B. Angela, D. Marichal and C. Rees, “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures,” Open Journal of Radilogy, 3, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2013.33024) was mistaken of the total isolates number in Table 2. The authors wish to correct the errors to: Table 2. Other study parameters “Gycm2” should be changed to “cGycm2” All of the decimal points (“.”) should be changed to commas (“,”). For example, “47.486” should be “47,486”.

关 键 词:Erratum 

分 类 号:R73[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象