检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尚晶 李宪印 Shang Jing;Li Xianyin
机构地区:[1]曲阜师范大学教育学院,曲阜273165 [2]云南民族大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《职业技术教育》2022年第34期13-19,共7页Vocational and Technical Education
基 金:国家社会科学基金2021年度教育学一般课题“职业教育混合所有制办学模式研究”(BJA210105),主持人:李宪印
摘 要:职业教育作为“跨界”的类型教育,对其本体存在的逻辑进行学理研究有利于发挥其理性表达与实践指引作用。目前,职业教育在“技术”与“职业”方面存在与“教育”相疏离的问题,需要消解其对峙性张力。深耕追问“技术”与“职业”的概念内涵是职业教育类型逻辑确立的前提。以“技术”合理性与“职业”合目的性相统一作为职业教育类型逻辑的内在支撑,以巩固和强化其合法性地位。“技术”合理性凸显人文向度的技术理性;“职业”合目的性彰显职业教育实践指向的工具理性;“教育”合法性糅合和指引“技术”合理性和“职业”合目的性,是职业教育作为类型教育的内在要求。Vocational education is a cross-boundary type of education. The research on the logic of its ontological existence is conducive to its rational expression and practical guidance. At present, vocational education is estranged from “education” in the aspects of “technology” and“occupation”, and its confrontation tension needs to be resolved. It is the premise of establishing the logic of the type of vocational education to inquire deeply into the conceptual connotation of “technology”and “occupation”. The unification of “technical”rationality and“vocational”purposiveness is the internal support of the type logic of vocational education, so as to consolidate and strengthen its legal status. Its“technical”rationality highlights the technical rationality of humanistic dimension;the purposiveness of“occupation” shows the instrumental rationality of the practical direction of vocational education;the legitimacy of “education” combines with the guidance of the rationality of“technology”and the purpose of “occupation”, which is the internal requirement of vocational education as a type of education.
分 类 号:G719.2[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28