检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丁 WANG Ding(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Shandong University)
机构地区:[1]山东大学哲学与社会发展学院
出 处:《基督教文化学刊》2021年第2期121-145,共25页Journal for the Study of Christian Culture
摘 要:长久以来,谢林哲学遭受的误解主要集中在他的晚期哲学中,尤其体现在对他晚期的"神话哲学"和"启示哲学"这两个名词的望文生义里。一方面,对于谢林这样一位曾经参与过德国唯心论的理性体系建构,却在晚期表面上看起来大谈特谈"基督教"的人,说"他在晚期陷入了‘宗教哲学’或者‘基督教哲学’的‘玄想’中",或"谢林晚期哲学是一种由‘神圣直观’奠基的存在论"未免有失偏颇。In his final stage,Schelling introduced the distinction between“positive philosophy”and“negative philosophy,”and explained specifically that his“positive philosophy”includes both“philosophy of mythology”and“philosophy of revelation.”In a narrow sense,Christianity is the subject of a“philosophy of revelation,”but in a broader sense,the entire“positive philosophy”can be regarded as the“Philosophy of Christianity.”Having said this,Schelling,however,repeatedly stressed that what he wanted to do was not a philosophical exposition of Christian doctrine,but rather a kind of examination of Christianity as a“grand historical event of the world”“towards the thing itself.”This paper argues that it is necessary to investigate in what sense a“philosophy of revelation”is a kind of“Philosophy of Christianity,”and what role Christianity played in Schelling’s later philosophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222