我国一流工科与世界一流工科还有差距吗——基于高精尖评价指标体系的分析  

Are There Gaps between First-class Engineering Disciplines of China and World-class Engineering Disciplines——Based on the Analysis of Top-grade Indicator System

作　　者：姜凡 刘念才[1] JIANG Fan;LIU Nian-cai(School of Education,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学教育学院,上海200240

出　　处：《高等教育研究》2022年第6期34-41,共8页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(18JZD051)

摘　　要：遵循世界一流标准,构建世界一流工科高精尖评价指标体系,选择代表性工科对我国一流工科与世界一流工科进行定量比较分析,结果表明:我国一流工科的总体表现已与世界一流工科相当,但在重大原创性成果、国际学术大师等方面与世界一流工科还存在明显的差距。应针对我国一流工科制定精准的建设目标和评价体系,以引导其迈向世界顶尖学科行列。It build a discipline evaluation system with top-grade indicators following the standard of world-class,and quantitatively compare the performance of first-class engineering disciplines of China and world-class engineering disciplines.The results show that the overall performance of first-class engineering disciplines of China and world-class engineering disciplines are close.Nevertheless,there are significant gaps on the performance of top-grade indicators such as original research breakthrough and academic masters.Specific goals and top-grade indicators are needed,which would lead the first-class engineering disciplines of China to the top.

关 键 词：世界一流学科 一流工科 学科评价 高精尖指标体系 

分 类 号：TB-4[一般工业技术] G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]