名号与称谓——王弼对言说问题之探讨  

Minghao and Chengwei:The Problem of Utterance in Wang Bi's Philosophy

作　　者：才清华[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2011年第5期60-71,共12页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：作者承担的"第四十六批中国博士后科学基金"(项目批准号:20090460577);"第二批中国博士后科学基金特别资助金"(项目批准号:200902216);"2009年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"(项目批准号:09YJC720008)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：王弼对言说问题的论述在其各类著述中一以贯之,在《老子注》和《老子指略》中,他对"言为何不尽意"的问题作了正面响应,这一响应又同"名号"与"称谓"的界定相关联。对"名号"与"称谓"的划分和使用,恰是为了理解和认识本体之"无"的需要所作之思考。王弼认为名号与称谓的区别在于使用之不同,亦即他们发挥的言说效用不同。因此,只有首先清楚如何看待语言的运用,才不至于陷入言说的圈套而不能自拔。Wang Bi's discussions on the problem of utterance were consistent throughout his works.In both his Commentary on Lao Zi and Laozi Zhilüe,he positively responded to the question of why meaning cannot be fully uttered by language.In the meantime his response was related to definitions of minghao and chengwei.In Wang Bi's mind,the comprehension of the ontological wu leads to differentiating minghao and chengwei.Wang Bi points out that minghao and chengwei played strikingly different roles in uttering the ontological Dao.

关 键 词：名号 称谓 道 启发式语言 

分 类 号：B235.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]