对主证、主证据、主要证据、直接证据的辨析  

Analysis of Definitive Evidences, Leading Evidences, Main Evidences and Direct Evidences

作　　者：范祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古财经学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010051

出　　处：《内蒙古财经学院学报（综合版）》2005年第1期57-60,共4页Journal of inner Mongolia finance and economics college

摘　　要：目前 ,学术界对主证、主证据、主要证据、直接证据的含义和界定比较模糊。本文认为 ,主证与旁证对称且是一个不甚严密的通常说法 ;主证据与补强证据对称 ;主要证据与非主要证据 (或次要证据 )对称 ;直接证据与间接证据对称。尤其对这些组证据的分类标准提出了与众有别的见解。Nowadays there is not a clear definition and division of the definitive evidence, leading evidence, main evidence and direct evidence in the academic field. The author believes that it is not appropriate to regard definitive evidences and circumstantial evidences as a symmetric pair. Leading evidences and additional evidences are paralleled, so are leading and minor evidence, direct and indirect evidences. In addition, the author holds unique view of classifying standard to these groups of evidences.

关 键 词：法律 诉讼证据 辨析 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]