检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑维伟[1,2]
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2013年第1期8-16,155,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences
摘 要:儒家宪政主义是近年来兴起的探讨儒家与宪政关系的政治思潮,其核心是发掘传统儒家控制王权的思想与行动,以此回应西方宪政实践的传统背景。这是一幅非常有诱惑力的政治图画,有助于开拓我们的想象力。但是,儒家在传统中国控制王权是失败的,而其教化出的民众之精神也与宪政所需要的公民不相符。当代中国政治发展应在确保秩序的前提下,逐步建立宪政民主制度。对此,儒家贡献甚少。儒家比较规整与踏实的出路是回归私人领域的生活儒学。The Confucian constitutionalism is the political thought which focuses on the relationship between Confucianism and constitutionalism. Its key issue is to explore how traditional Confucianism controls the royalty, so as to respond the traditional background of western constitutional practices. It seems like an attractive political view, which is conductive to explore people' imagination. However, traditional Confucian failed to control the royalty, the people's spirit educated by Confucianism was not suitable for the citizen constitutionalism needed. Contemporary Chinese political development should construct constitutional democracy gradually under political order, yet Confucianism contributed little for this issue. In this sense, what the modern Confucianism can do is just return to the private realm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117