检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京交通大学交通运输学院,北京100044 [2]北京交通发展研究中心,北京100073
出 处:《交通信息与安全》2013年第3期20-27,共8页Journal of Transport Information and Safety
基 金:国家高科技研究发展计划(863计划)项目(批准号:2011AA110302)资助
摘 要:为了在Synchro进行干道信号协调优化时选取较好信号配时方案,应用Vissim模型搭建了基于最小延误、最少停车次数和最小PI值3种不同优化目标方案的仿真平台。以行程时间、延误、平均排队长度以及停车次数为评价指标,对比分析了3种优化目标方案。以北京市首都机场东区四纬路为例,研究结果表明,以行程时间、延误、平均排队长度以及停车次数为评价指标时,基于最小延误的优化方案均为最优。建议在利用Synchro进行干道信号协调优化时,采用基于最小延误的优化方案而不是默认的基于最小PI值方案。此外,基于最小PI值的优化方案在除停车次数之外的评价指标对比中,明显优于基于最少停车次数的优化方案。In order to determine the optimal signal timing plan in Synchro for signal coordination on the arterial road,three simulation platforms were established by using VISSIM model based on the criteria of minimum delay,minimum stops,and minimum PI,respectively.A comparative analysis was conducted between the optimization plans by using the evaluation indexes of vehicle delay,vehicle travel time,queue length,and vehicle stops.A case study was carried out on Siwei Road in the East Section of Beijing Capital International Airport.The results indicate that the timing plan optimized based on the minimum delay performs best when all the four indexes are jointly considered.Consequently,it is recommended to adopt the optimization plan based on minimum delay instead of the default minimum PI when Synchro is used for arterial signal coordination.Further,the optimization timing plan based on the minimum PI performs significantly better than that based on the minimum stops on all indexes except vehicle stops.
分 类 号:U491[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229