庄子国属问题述评  

On the Birthplace of Zhuangzi

作　　者：宋健[1] 

机构地区：[1]汕头大学文学院,广东汕头515063

出　　处：《商丘师范学院学报》2013年第7期30-33,共4页Journal of Shangqiu Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"战国时期的社会转型与诗歌创作演变研究"(编号:10YJC751069);汕头大学科研启动经费项目"庄屈并称现象研究"(编号:STF12014)

摘　　要：关于庄子的国属,历来存在五种观点,即宋人说、齐人说、梁人说、楚人说和鲁人说。其中持"宋人说"者,多为战国后期及两汉时人,去古未远,其观点得到了普遍认可。后来又经过近现代学人的补证,"宋人说"已成为庄子国属的定谳。其他四说,各有其产生的根源,也存在不同程度的偏颇。由于缺乏后人的响应,"梁人说"和"鲁人说"已先后绝迹。现在"齐人说"和"楚人说",仍有一定的影响力。究其根源,既有学术理念的偏差,又不乏个人及地方的私念,但这都无法否定庄子为宋人的历史事实。It is constantly held that Zhuangzi's birthplace is Song State,Qi State,Liang State,Chu State or Lu State.The fact that Zhuan-gzi is a native of Song State is held by the people in the period of Warring States and Han Dynasties and is accepted by many people now.After many textual research of modern scholars ,the fact that Zhuangzi is a native of Song becomes a final conclusion .Other claims have their origins and mistakes .The claims of Liang native and Lu native no longer exist ,while the claims of Qi native and Chu native still have some influence .Despite these wrong ideas ,the fact that Zhuangzi is a native of Song State is undeniable .

关 键 词：庄子 国属 蒙地 商丘 

分 类 号：B222.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]