“思想—学术”纠偏救弊论及其思想史意义——王元化到底反思什么  

Wang Yuanhua's Concept of Ideology-Academics as Social Remedy and Its Implications to Intellectual History

作　　者：劳承万[1] 蓝国桥[1] 

机构地区：[1]湛江师范学院"康德--牟宗三"研究所

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2014年第4期60-71,共12页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

摘　　要：王元化作为一个文化思想史家弃世而去已经六年了,但学界对他的"思想—学术"信念之回应,却是如此之寂寥——但文化思想史的轨迹,是绝不会绕开王元化的。"有学术的思想/有思想的学术"之崇高箴言,是王元化在当代社会纠偏救弊的艰难成果。有识之士只有在追踪其前因后果、来龙去脉之后,才能进入这个平凡而深刻的"匡时"世界中去。王元化所忧虑者,正是这种精神无根、六神无主的"癫癫狂狂"之态势对人类崇高思想——严肃学问的一种戏谑与挑战。态势仅是热烈的现象,而深层根源却是令人战栗的虚无弊端。中国现代文化思想史,需要认真考究者,正是隐没在此等"现象"之后的文化深层弊端。王元化选择"反思"之路,首先迈步跨入中国当代思想史之荆棘领域,实是一大胆识与开拓。Wan Yuanhua(1920—2008) believed that academic research and ideology should be integrated with each other,and this idea of ideology-academics integration is Wang's preposition to redress the social maladies. Although his idea has not found fervent echoes in the academic circle,the paper claims that his idea could not be ignored during the development of our cultural intellectual history and can be done full justice by scholars who have investigated the origin,trajectory and outcome of his idea.What worried Wan Yuanhua was the spiritual rootlessness shown in the cynicalness toward and mindless challenge of serious academic pursuit. Wang Yuanhua's intellectual reflection is to make seen the hidden force that pushes an unhealthy cultural trend in today's society,often in the form of massive crazy star-chasing,or huge piles of tawdry publications,or any other cultural rubbish. His pioneering efforts have indeed shed great light on our intellectual history.

关 键 词：思想 学术 纠偏救弊 文化思想史 

分 类 号：I0-02[文学—文学理论]