论主债权罹于时效之抵押权  

Disscussion on the Mortgage Right in the Event That the Principal Creditor's Right Surpasses the Prescriptive Period

作　　者：周德强[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学法学院,浙江杭州310028

出　　处：《金融理论与实践》2004年第8期44-46,共3页Financial Theory and Practice

摘　　要：当主债权因诉讼时效经过而消灭时,通常认为消灭的只是其胜诉权,其权利本身并未消灭。因而,对主债权罹于时效的抵押权应作何处理,在理论界产生了较大的分歧。当前几成通说的理论是:为主债权诉讼时效经过后的抵押权再设一个除斥期间。笔者认为:虽然债权诉讼时效经过未消灭其权利本身,依附其上的抵押权也应消灭。When the principal creditor's right is eliminated because of the extinctive prescription, it is generally believed that what is eliminated is only the right to win a lawsuit instead of the whole right itself. Therefore, there are still great different opinions on how to deal with the mortgage right when the principal creditor's right has surpassed the prescriptive period. The open theory that says at present is that we should set a scheduled period for the mortgage right when the principal creditor's right has surpassed the prescriptive period. However, the author holds that the attached mortgage right should also be eliminated although the whole right itself is not eliminated when the creditor's right surpassed the prescriptive period.

关 键 词：主债权 诉讼时效 抵押权 除斥期间 

分 类 号：F832.2[经济管理—金融学]