检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖永明[1]
出 处:《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2004年第5期30-34,共5页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"宋代四书学与理学"(课题号:02BZX032)阶段性成果
摘 要:从《四书》学的角度,对北宋中后期活跃于学术舞台的理学、荆公新学与苏氏蜀学进行了比较分析,认为在治学方法和理论特点上三者有较多的相同之处,都注重阐发经典精义、关注天道心性问题、自出义理、发挥己意,但在三派学术的具体内容特别是对《四书》思想资料的阐述和发挥方面又存在较大差异,各具特色。Viewing at an angle of 'the Four Books' research, the paper makes a comparison among Neo-confucianism, the New Learning of Wang Anshi and the Shu Learning of Su Shi, which all appeared on the academic stage of the Northern Song Dynasty. The three schools of thought have similarities on their academic methods and their theory characteristics, while on the concrete contents of their learning and on the methods of expounding 'the Four Books', the three have characteristics of their own.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.232