证据法若干基本问题的法哲学分析  

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Several Basic Issues of Evidential Law

作　　者：江伟[1] 吴泽勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2002年第1期24-38,共15页China Legal Science

摘　　要：通过对证据法中的三个基本问题进行历史的和辨证的分析，作者认为：关于诉讼证明要求，近几年兴起的“法律真实说”并不是完善的学说，而传统的“客观真实说”只要按照辩证唯物主义的认识论加以修正，就仍然有其存在的价值；关于证据调查的方式，当前的任务不是仅仅从口头上强调当事人举证，限制法官查证，而是正确地划分当事人举证与法官查证各自的范围，并完善相应的保障和约束机制；关于司法证明方式，全盘接受自由心证制度或法定证据制度中的任何一种都不是理性的选择，应结合我国的具体国情和两大法系证据规则的特点，在证据制度的不同方面，分别借鉴两种模式中的有益部分。Through historical analysis of three basic issues in evidential law, the author considers that the newly arising “legal truth doctrine” is not perfect in relation to the requisites of authentication, but the traditional “objective truth doctrine” has its existing value if properly amended. In relation to the methods of evidential investigation, the task is not limited to strengthen the parties’ burden of prove but to divide the respective scopes of parties’ burden of prove and judges’ investigation correctively, and improve relative mechanism of safeguarding and controlling. In relation to the methods of judicial authentication, the author points out that we should absorb those useful elements of two major legal systems according to China’s special conditions.

关 键 词：当事人举证 证据法 法官 法哲学分析 法定证据制度 诉讼证明 法律真实说 查证 约束机制 基本问题 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]