西方语言哲学三个问题的梳理——语言哲学系列研究之五  

On Three Problems Concerning Philosophy of Language

作　　者：钱冠连[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心,510420

出　　处：《现代外语》2001年第3期221-227,共7页Modern Foreign Languages

摘　　要：在汉语语境下,有迫切必要对西方分析哲学与语言哲学的所指进行辨析。事实上,两者是同指,只是“语言哲学”这一术语正式启用在1973年之后。但是还有一些疑团没有解决。语言哲学具有母哲学的性质,不宜将语言哲学看成是分析哲学的一个分支。The linguistic turn 译成“语言转向”是误译。Philosophy of language 与汉语语境中的“语言哲学”并非对应,各有所指。It is urgent that, within the context of the Chinese language, to make clear what object analytical philosophy and philosophy of language in the West refer to. As a matter of fact, the two terms have the same reference, while the term of 損hilosophy of language?appeared only in 1973. There are still, however, some puzzles to be uncoiled. Philosophy of language is, in a sense, first philosophy, namely, what I called 搈other philosophy? so it is not appropriate to envisage philosophy of language as a branch of analytical philosophy.

关 键 词：西方语言哲学 所指 误译 对应 汉语语境 语言转向 辨析 分析哲学 术语 梳理 

分 类 号：H0-0[语言文字—语言学] H0