检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑杰文[1]
机构地区:[1]曲阜师范大学中文系
出 处:《文学遗产》2002年第4期4-13,共10页
摘 要:本文以上博藏 2 9支说《诗》简、《论语》《孟子》《礼记》载孔子说《诗》解《诗》资料 83条、《左传》《国语》说《诗》引《诗》资料 3 1 7条为基础材料 ,比较了竹书《诗论》与孔子说《诗》在思想观念与解《诗》方法上的差异 ,证明了竹书《诗论》的作者不是孔子 ,孔子说《诗》与竹书《诗论》分属不同的先秦《诗》学系统。The text compares the bamboo book On Poetry with the explanations of The Book of Poetry , made by Confucius, referring to bamboo books Series 29, conserved in the Museum of Shanghai, such as the explanations of The Book of Poetry , taken from The Analects of Confucius, Mencius, The Book of Rites , eighty-three items in total, and taken from Zuo Zhuan (左传), Guo Yu (国语),three-hundred-and-seventeen items in total. It finds the difference in the ideological methods between the bamboo book On Poetry and the explanations of The Book of Poetry , made by Confucius, which must belong to two systems of poetics before the Chin Dynasty, and confirms that the author of the bamboo book On Poetry is not Confucius.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147