《史记》三“书”评议  

A Review of Three Books about The Record of History

作　　者：安东[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京出版社出版集团,北京100011

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2005年第1期65-68,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

摘　　要：《史记》篇目问题较多 ,而又以“八书”为甚。学界虽然对“八书”总体的看法没有什么分歧 ,但有三点需要注意 :其一是《史记》缺少《礼书》、《乐书》和《兵书》 ,八篇中就有三篇有问题 ;其二是对《太史公自序》的几句话该怎么理解 ,《律书》和《兵书》的关系应是怎样的 ;其三是在司马迁创作“八书”的大前提下 ,上述三篇中是否还有后人搀入的部分。There are many problems for the articles in The Record of History,especially more problems for Eight Books.Despite few different general ideas on the Eight Books in the academic field,there are three aspects deserving discussion.First,there are no Book on Rituals,Book On Music,and Book on Military in The Record of History,i.e.,three of the Eight Books are problematic.Second,how do people understand the several sentences in the Taishigong's auto-preface,and what is the relationship between the Book on Law and Book on Military?Thirdly,under the premise of Si Maqian writing the Eight Books,are some parts of the Three Books mentioned above added by other people in the later times?

关 键 词：《史记》 《礼书》 《乐书》 《兵书》 中国 篇目问题 司马迁 学术思想 

分 类 号：K204.2[历史地理—历史学]