中西历史之“会通”与中国史学的转向  

The Introduction of Western Historiography in China and Changes in Chinese Historiography

作　　者：章清[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学历史系,中外现代化进程研究中心,教授200433

出　　处：《历史研究》2005年第2期75-95,共21页Historical Research

基　　金："中国现代学科的形成"(The Formation of Modern Academic Disciplinesin China)的部分研究成果;德国学术基金会(DAAD)资助;中国留学基金会(CSC)资助

摘　　要：晚清知识界分别“新学”与“旧学”,相应地也区分了“中史”与“西史”。在这样的背景下展开的中西历史之“会通”,影响着中国史学的转向。史学之走向“中心”,乃“经世致用”思想所催生;在“援西入中”过程中,“史学”作为西学的重要组成部分得到阐述。经历这些曲折,“史之意义与范围”等明显含有学科意识的问题为史家所关注。然而,史学学科的自主性,在史之范围愈益放大的同时,却成了问题,预示着史学作为现代学科在中国之确立,仍有其“未完成性”的一面。By distinguishing the “new learning” from the “old learning,” scholars made a distinction between “Chinese historiography” and the “Western historiography” in the late Qing dynasty. The introduction of Western historiography into China in such a context played a role in the changes in Chinese historiography. In attempts to make academic learning useful in governing the state, historiography was brought center stage. In the process of “borrowing from the West,” historiography was put forward as part of Western learning. Chinese historians began to concern themselves with such questions as the meaning and domain of historical study, which obviously take historical study as an independent discipline. However, as the domain of historical study expands, its autonomy as an independent discipline is open to question. That shows that the process of establishing historiography as a modern academic discipline is yet to be accomplished in China.

关 键 词：中国史学 转向 会通 历史 中西 “经世致用”思想 重要组成部分 “新学” “中心” 学科意识 未完成性 自主性 作为 晚清 史家 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] G633.51[文化科学—教育学]