论朱陆之争  

On the Arguments between Zhu and Lu

作　　者：崔大华[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南省社会科学院,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《东华理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2005年第1期14-17,共4页Journal of East China Institute of Technology

摘　　要：朱熹和陆九渊前后有六次争论,可归约为为学之方、经典诠释、人物评价等三项内容,反映了朱陆在理学本体论和工夫论上的深刻分歧。朱陆之争在其后的理学进程中有重要意义,是理学理论水平的一个尺度,也是理学发展的一个契机。对朱陆之争理论性质的诠定,从一个具体的方面显示了明清以来中国哲学史诠释模式的变迁。There were six arguments between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan.The arguments included the three contents of the methods of study,Ceassic annotation and character appraisal.The arguments reflected the great differences between ontology and gongfu theory of Lixue.The arguments had important significance in the later progress of Lixue and were a measure of Lixue theory level and also a good chance for Lixue development.The annotation of the theoretical characteristics of the arguments between Zhu and Lu shows the change of annotation model of Chinese philosaphical history since Ming and Qing Dynasties from a concrete way.

关 键 词：朱陆之争 为学之方 经典诠释 人物评价 

分 类 号：B224.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B224.8