课程创新与历险:喧闹之后再沉思——我国“综合实践活动”与日本“综合学习时间"之比较  

Reflection on the Comparison between the Japanese Courses of 'Time of Integrated Study' and Chinese 'integrated Practical Activities'

作　　者：黄伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]皖西学院教育系,安徽六安237009

出　　处：《比较教育研究》2005年第7期12-16,共5页International and Comparative Education

摘　　要：在新世纪之初,中日两国基础教育课程改革都把课程综合化作为改革的重要目标,分别推出“综合实践活动”和“综合学习时间”课程。将二者比较,可以从日本的综合学习时间课程中受到启示,同时也能更深刻地理解和把握我国的综合实践活动课程,进而引发我们对当前“综合实践活动”课程研究与实验中的问题进行深度透视和反思。At the end of the old century and the beginning of the new one, curriculum integration is identified as an important goal in the reform of elementary education curriculum in both China and Japan. The courses of time of integrated study and ' integrated practical activities were put forward respectively. Comparison between the two enables us to gain some enlightenment from Japanese course of 'time of integrated study , and get a deeper understanding of our own course of integrated practical activities , it also arouse deeper research and reflection on the problems in current study and experiment of integrated practical activities .

关 键 词：日本 中国 课程 综合实践活动 综合学习时间:比较 

分 类 号：G632.3[文化科学—教育学]