分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异  

The Different Outcome of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice and Interactional Justice

作　　者：周浩[1] 龙立荣[2] 王燕[1] 王忠军[1] 吴怡[1] 柯善玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079 [2]华中科技大学管理学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《心理学报》2005年第5期687-693,共7页Acta Psychologica Sinica

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助(项目号:70171046)。

摘　　要：以大学生奖学金评比为例,探讨了组织公正各维度影响效果的差异。选取661名大学生为被试,采用2×2×2的完全随机设计,以情境故事法(scenarios)呈现刺激,研究了奖学金评比中分配公正、程序公正、互动公正对大学生学习投入、班级荣誉感、班级归属感、与辅导员的关系的影响。结果表明,组织公正三个维度与效果变量之间存在清晰的对应影响关系:分配公正主要影响具体、以个人为参照的效果变量;程序公正主要影响与组织有关的效果变量;互动公正主要影响与上司有关的效果变量。This study examined the different outcome of distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice in scholarship appraisal. 661 college students participated in the study, a 2 × 2 × 2 completely randomized design was employed, and 8 scenarios which consisted of the information on distributive justice/injustice, procedural justice/injustice and interactional justice/injustice were used as research materials to analyze the influence of organizational justices on students＇ learning attitude, class honourableness, class belongingness and relationship with life teacher. The result indicated that distributive justice had the most explanative effect on person-referenced outcomes, procedural justice had the most explanative effect on organization-referenced outcomes, and interactional justice had the most explanative effect on supervisor-referenced outcomes, respectively.

关 键 词：组织公正 组织不公正 分配公正 程序公正 互动公正 

分 类 号：B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93[哲学宗教—心理学]