程序性制裁制度的法理学分析  

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System

作　　者：陈瑞华[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2005年第6期150-163,共14页China Legal Science

摘　　要：程序性制裁所针对的是侦查人员、检察人员和审判人员违反法律程序的行为,并以宣告诉讼行为无效为其基本制裁方式。这种“程序违法直接导致实体结论无效”的制裁方式,可以维护刑事诉讼程序的有效实施,使得程序正义价值得到现实的保障,促使法院不成为警察、检察官和下级法官违反法律程序的“帮凶”和“共犯”,并对其违反法律程序的行为在举行司法审查的前提下,作出违法和无效之宣告。当然,作为一种追究法律责任的方式,程序性制裁也有其内在的局限性。尽管如此,程序性制裁对于维护诉讼程序的实施仍具有其不可替代的意义。Procedural sanction is aimed at investigator, procurator and judge whose conduct runs counter to legal procedure and its basic sanction is to announce the trial null and void. Such sanction can safeguard the effective execution of criminal procedure and the realization of value of procedural justice, make court be supervisor of police, procurator and judge of lower court and finally promote the judicial justice. Although this sanction has its defects, its role in safeguarding procedural law can not be substituted.

关 键 词：程序性违法 程序性制裁 宣告无效 程序性裁判 权利救济 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]