民事诉讼收费制度改革的理念及路径  

The Reformation Idea and Path of the Charge System of Civil Litigation

作　　者：张榕[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2006年第1期138-148,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：民事诉讼收费的合理性在一定程度上反映着一个国家的人民享受法律保障的程度。但我国自开始实行诉讼收费制度以来,所有有关诉讼收费的规范均由最高人民法院制定,在我国目前各级财政尚不能全额支付法院全部所需费用的情况下,法院本身与诉讼收费有着直接的利益关系,诉讼收费成为支撑审判成本的主要来源。这种制度安排不但使当事人承担了高额的诉讼成本,而且可能直接阻却当事人行使诉权。因此,诉讼收费制度的改革势在必行。我国应当理性地确定国家和当事人各自应承担的审判成本,并应将诉讼收费制度纳入民事诉讼法的调整范畴。The charge of civil litigation is a reflection that how the people be protected. In our country, all the regulations on the charge are made by the Supreme People＇ s Court, and our government finance can＇ t afford the whole fees that the court system＇s need, the court system itself has direct interest in litigation charge, the charge became the main source which afford the judicial cost. All these make parties bear the great amount of lawsuit cost, and it may hinder parties to carry out litigation. So, reforming the charge system of civil procedure is imperative. We should confirm the judicial cost that the country and party should bear each reasonably, and the charge system should be embraced by civil procedural law.

关 键 词：民事诉讼收费 改革 审判成本 民事诉讼法 中国 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]