检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学管理学院,陕西西安710072 [2]西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安710049
出 处:《系统工程》2006年第3期88-94,共7页Systems Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70172010)
摘 要:利用经济附加值(EVA)来改进中国传统绩效评价模式,并建立了整合EVA的绩效评价(IEPM)模型。以沪深两市A股上市公司为研究样本,采用BP神经网络方法检验了整合EVA的绩效评价模型相对于传统评价模式的有效性。结果显示,整合EVA的绩效评价模型要显著优于传统评价模式,而且其预测能力也显著强于传统模式,说明用整合EVA的绩效评价模型来评价和预测企业的经营业绩是更为有效的。This paper made a study on how to improve traditional performance measurements with Economic Value Added (EVA). It presented the integrated EVA performance measurement (IEPM) model and tested the validity. The difference between IEPM model and traditional performance measurements was empirically analyzed using BP neural network with the data from China's listed companies. The results showed that IEPM model performed better than traditional performance measurements and the predictive ability of IEPM model was also proved to be superior to that of traditional performance measurements. So it is effective and reasonable to use IEPM model to evaluate and predict the firm's performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222