论焦循的《尚书》学研究  

On Jiao Xun's Shang-shu Learning

作　　者：陈居渊[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学系,上海200433

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2006年第3期8-13,共6页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(05BZX039)

摘　　要：以焦循所撰《尚书补疏》为考察对象,分析焦循对《尚书》这部古经意义的新探索。焦循维护伪《孔传》的经典地位,是他确认伪《孔传》蕴含着“二帝三王之道”的真谛,体现了经典的古代意义与传注的现代诠释的统一,具有思想史上的价值。同时,焦循提出《舜典》未亡、《大禹谟》和《皋陶谟》原为一篇的猜想,现据《郭店楚墓竹简》所提供的文本,倒可备为一说,值得重视。Aiming at the ＂Shang - shu - bu - shu＂ by Jiao Xun, the paper analyzes the new research of the ancient significance of ＂Shang - shu＂ by Jiao Xun. It points out that Jiao defended the classical position of pseudograph ＂Kong - chuan＂ in order to affirm the ＂Kingcraft of Er Huang and San Wang＂ in it, which embodies the unite of ancient significance of classics and modem hermeneutics of annotation and posses its own value in the intellectual history. Meanwhile, Jiao suggested that ＂Yao - dian＂ had not disappeared and ＂Da - yu - mo＂ and ＂Gao - tao - mo＂ were originally of the same piece, which worthed it while referring to the texts from ＂Guodian Tomb no. 1＂ and should be laid more emphasis on.

关 键 词：焦循 尚书补疏 诠释 

分 类 号：B249.8[哲学宗教—中国哲学]