检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文秋芳[1]
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学,100089
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2006年第3期189-195,共7页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"中国大学生英语口语能力发展的规律与特点"(04BYY039)的一部分
摘 要:本研究采用英语专业学生四年的口语跟踪语料,用流利性、词汇多样性与词频广度三个指标分析口语词汇的使用,并与美国大学生的语料进行比较,旨在揭示其变化的趋势与特点。学习者语料源于2001年入学的56名英语专业学生,他们每年在语言实验室里完成一篇议论文文体的口头作文。本族语语料源于15名美国大学生,其口头作文的要求同于中国大学生。研究结果表明,学习者总体样本在流利性、词汇多样性和词频广度上的发展呈上升趋势,与本族语大学生的表现形成连续体。4年级学生在流利性和词汇多样性方面显著低于本族语大学生,但在词频广度上的差别与本族语大学生的差异不具有统计意义。2-3年级是三个指标变化的最佳时段。三个指标起点不同的组别,进步轨迹不完全相同。低起点组进步显著大于中起点组,中起点组稍快于高起点组。This paper reports a longitudinal study on the changes in speaking vocabulary by English majors through four years’ learning, which was then compared with the native speakers’ performance. The English learners involved in the study were 56 students who were enrolled in a university in 2001. They were asked to complete an oral task by producing a three_minute monologue after three minutes’ preparation in a language lab. The native speakers were 15 American college students who accomplished the same task as the English learners. The developmental changes were measured in terms of three indexes: fluency, word variations and lexical frequency profile. The performance on the three indexes of the students across four years and the native speakers form a continuum. However, Year Four students were significantly lower in fluency and word variations than native speakers, but similar to the native speakers in lexical frequency profile. The period between Year Two and Year Three saw the most noticeable progress. The students with different starting levels of the three indexes varied in terms of their changes. The low_level group made greater progress than the middle_level group which produced slightly faster progress than the high_level group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.201.156