检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学教育学院,北京100871 [2]莱芜职业技术学院,莱芜271100
出 处:《北京大学教育评论》2006年第2期85-92,共8页Peking University Education Review
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"中国教育与人力资源问题研究"(03JZD003)。
摘 要:本文基于国家统计局“城调队”的中国城镇住户调查数据,采用基尼系数统计指标和分位数计量回归方法,对我国城镇不同群体的收入水平、收入差异、教育差异以及收入与教育之间的关系进行了实证研究。研究结果表明:我国城镇居民的收入差距呈现显著的扩大趋势;城镇居民收入差距扩大的主要因素可以归结为低收入群体的收入不平等;受教育程度越高的群体其收入差异的基尼系数越小;“弱收入能力群体”的教育收益率显著高于“强收入能力群体”的教育收益率。Based on data from Chinese Urban Household Survey collected in 2005 , employing Gini Coefficient , and Quantile Regression Method, this study has investigated statistically and econometrically the income level, income inequality, education inequality, and the relationship between education and income among different groups of people. The regression results and statistic estimates have found; First, the income inequality has shown a significant increasing trend since the beginning of 1990s. Second, the increasing income gaps attribute to the inequality within lowest income group. Third, the higher the averaged educational level of one group is, the smaller the income gap within its group is. Finally, the rate of return to education for the group with weaker ability to gain earnings is bigger than that for the group with stronger ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3