检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾春华[1] 王庆国[1] 王永炎[2] 黄启福[1] 鲁兆麟[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [2]中国中医科学院,北京100700
出 处:《北京中医药大学学报》2006年第5期298-300,306,共4页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No.2003CB517101)
摘 要:目的探讨不同证候划分中证候概念转换的逻辑关系。方法以逻辑学的方法考察《伤寒论》中“太阳中风证”与“桂枝汤证”两种证候概念的差异。结果《伤寒论》中“太阳中风证”与“桂枝汤证”两种证候概念的关系只是“相容关系”不是“等同”关系。结论证候研究中必须明确证候概念转换的逻辑关系,并对“以方测证”的研究方法与“同病异治”“异病同治”的认识方法所得到的推论做了逻辑学上的反思。Objective To discuss the logical relation in concept transition of syndrome manifestations in different syndrome types. Method To use the logical method to examine the difference between windattack syndrome of Taiyang (WAST) and Guizhi Decoction syndrome (GDS) in the book of "Shanghan Lun". Result The relation between WAST and GDS, two concepts of syndrome manifestations, is not an equal relation but an inter-tolerance relation. Conclusion The logical relation in the concept transition of syndromes must be clarified in the research of syndrome manifestations. The seff-thought was made logically on the deduction from the method of "forecasting syndrome from prescriptions", and the methods of "treating the same disease with different therapies" and "different diseases treated with the same therapy".
分 类 号:R222.2[医药卫生—中医基础理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117