王清任“方效论错”原因初探  

Probing the cause on Wang Qingren's idea of "Fallacious theory, effective prescription" of Wang Qingren

作　　者：潘大为[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学,广州2005级博士研究生510405

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2006年第3期177-181,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical History

摘　　要：晚清医家王清任著《医林改错》提出的人体理论异于传统中医理论,也异于解剖学,但《医林改错》所载方剂在临床上却确实有效,“方效论错”的悖论提示研究者,王清任的理论不是粗浅的解剖学。通过对《医林改错》的脏腑观念、“气血”观念以及人体理论的仔细分析,王清任的理论被证明尽管背离了传统中医理论的许多观点,但继承了中医理论中核心的“气血”观念,因此仍然属于中医理论范围。对“气血”观念的继承,是“方效论错”的根源。王清任批评传统中医理论、建立新理论的过程中显示的,对现代中医有启示意义。The theory of human body in Yilin Gaicuo （Correction on Errors in Medical Classics） by Wang Qingren in late Qing Dynasty is different from that of traditional Chinese Medicine and that of anatomy of western medicine. However, the prescriptions recorded in Yilin Gaicuo （Correction on Errors in Medical Classics） are indeed effective clinically. The paradox of ＂Fallacious theory, effective prescription＂ suggests that the theories of Wang Qingren are not superficial in anatomy. By carefully analyzing the concept of zang-fu organs and concept of qi and blood as well as the theory of human body in Yilin Gaicuo （Correction on Errors in Medical Classics）, although many viewpoints of theories of Wang Qingren deviates from that of traditional Chinese Medicine, they inherits the qi and blood concept, the core theory of Chinese Medicine. Therefore, the theories belong to the theoretical scope of Chinese Medicine. The root of ＂Fallacious theory, effective prescription＂ is in the heritage of the qi and blood concept. The set view of Wang Qingren in criticizing the theories of traditional Chinese Medicine and establishing new theories revealed in this process possesses the significance of revelation to the contemporary Chinese Medicine.

关 键 词：王清任 《医林改错》 气 血 脏腑 

分 类 号：R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]